CONSTITUTION OVERTURNED BY HR 6166

October 11, 2006

Enemy Combatant
Concerned Citizen

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” ~ Benjamin Franklin

 Still think America is the ‘Land of the Free’? We’re free to do as we’re told. Effective September 27, American citizens who dissent and protest the unconstitutional practices of the Bush Administration are subject to be labeled ‘enemy combatants’ and indefinitely detained and tortured without due process of law.

 While our mass media syndicates were distracting you with the Mark Foley pedophilia scandal, the House discreetly passed House Resolution 6166: The Military Commissions Act of 2006, also known as “the torture bill”. 219 Republicans and 34 Democrats voted to strip basic human and legal rights from U.S. citizens.

 More specially, HR 6166 will effectively:

 give the President amnesty for committing war crimes.

  • provide amnesty to war criminals in the military.
  • revoke habeas corpus rights, which allows U.S. military detainees a right to appeal charges.
  • render the Geneva Conventions null and void.
  • allow the police to search your home without a warrant.
  • revoke legal protection from self-incrimination.
  • eliminate the idea of rape and sexual assault as torture.
  • allow the government to use testimony extracted through torture.
  • allow the government to imprison people based on secret evidence without telling them the charges.
  • remove the right to cross-examine witnesses.
  • allow the records of trials to be kept secret from the public.
  • take away the right to a speedy trial.
  • enable trials to begin before a thorough investigation.
  • allow people to be put on trial in front of a military tribunal, even if they aren’t in the military.
  • create a secret committee appointed by Bush and Rumsfeld that has the power to declare any person an ‘enemy combatant’, depriving them of basic human rights, legal rights, or an appeal.
  • label a legal resident of the U.S. ‘legal’ and ‘illegal enemy combatant’ subject to indefinite detainment without an appeal.
  • label a foreign citizen living in their own country ‘illegal enemy combatant’ subject to indefinite detainment without an appeal.

 

Clever. The bill both permits the Bush Administration to violate international rules of war and protects them from any repercussions for doing so by prohibiting the court from striking down the entire Act preemptively, and retroactively, ex post facto defines new crimes and punishments. Therefore, this legislation provides amnesty for unreliable WMD and 9/11 data extracted from illegal simulated death-burials in Egypt and the treatment of Guantanamo Bay POWs during 2001-06 which failed to meet Geneva requirements. Can we expect U.N. intervention? Not likely, especially considering the U.S. retains the power to veto.

 Anyone who donates to a charity considered by the Bush Administration as a ‘terrorist organization’ could be declared an ‘unlawful enemy combatant’ and imprisoned indefinitely. In times of war and national crisis, the government has targeted immigrants and dissidents. Anyone who speaks out against the government’s policies is subject to the same treatment in our generation’s version of the Alien and Sedition Acts.

 The dissidents of today are tomorrow’s political prisoners. Former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer warned Americans, “They better watch what they say, watch what they do.” And if they don’t? No problem. Halliburton’s subsidiary KBR announced on January 24 that it had been awarded a $385 million contingency contract by the Department of Homeland Security to build detention camps in the U.S.

 Still not worried? Please to take the time to consider why the Bush Administration felt it necessary to pass HR 6166, destroy our Constitution, and legalize torture and war crimes. The Founding Fathers understood that the biggest threat to a country comes not from an external enemy, but from the government itself. They hate our freedoms,” President Bush is so fond of saying. With bills such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the Military Commissions Act, doesn’t it make you wonder who the real terrorists are?

12 Responses to “CONSTITUTION OVERTURNED BY HR 6166”

  1. Wayne Fehrer Says:

    WOW
    Sound like the US is NAZI Germany. WOW and I do mean WOW! Thanks dude
    Wayne

  2. Jed Walls Says:

    Habeus Corpus is very important. Keith Olbermann had a good piece you can find on youtube about this subject, just search under his name.

    I’m not necessarily an advocate of the brash style of reporting that FOX News pioneered and the rest of the news stations have adopted to keep up, but I would love to see someone who argues that America is a better place since Habeus Corpus can be removed from anyone (including the president himself).

  3. Ryan Says:

    I’m having trouble finding some of your bullet points supported in the text of the document.

    Click to access getdoc.cgi

    Some minor corrections, Habeus Corpus is only revokable to for non-citizens. WHile still unacceptable, its irrresponsible to leave out that distinction.

    Enemy combatant is clearly defined in the document, I don’t see how it leaves that definition open to change by any Presidential committee. And once again, there is no way for a citizen to be declared such. This invalidates your assumption that any person who donates to a charity linked to a terrorist group can be declared an enemy combatant.

    I also saw that rape was considered listed as a crime, but nothing about its status as torture or not.

    I am not by any means supporting this bill. It’s a disgusting effort to undermine the constiution and continue the path toward consolidatin all power in the Presidency. However there is plenty of real bad in it, so it’s best to clarify statements that seem innaccurate. If any of my points are wrong, please help me sort them out.

  4. Josh Says:

    Ryan, you are missing what is at issue. HR 6166 is not a document that defines LAWFULL combatants, rather it redefines UNLAWFULL enemy combatants and details the lack of rights they suffer as such.

    YOU can be declared an unlawful enemy combatant who is not subject to Geneva Convention or basic rights if you:

    Commit Assault “Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a civilian population as such, or individual civilians not taking active part in hostilities, shall be punished…” – Section 950V

    Damage Private Property “Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon a civilian object that is not a military objective shall be punished…”- Section 950V

    Damage Public Property “Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally engages in an attack upon protected property shall be punished…” – Section 950V NOTE: In this same chapter ‘protected property’ is defined as “property specifically protected by the law of war such as buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science, or charitable purposes,” etc.

    Commit Theft “any person subject to this chapter who intentionally and in the absence of military necessity appropriates or sizes property for private or personal use, without the consent of a person with authority to permit such appropriation or seizue, shall be punished…” – Section 950V

    One may argue that such common crimes surely must only apply to forigners or forigners during times of war. Leading constitutional scholars and news papers agree this smashes founding rights afforded to the public.

    The NY Times – http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/28/opinion/28thu1.html?ex=1163480400&en=ef56c2ca9da3bd5b&ei=5070

    The LA Times –
    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ackerman28sep28,0,619852.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail

    Perhaps worst of all, it is illegal (even for the supreme court) to challange the lawfullness of the bill.

    Section 950j states…

    …no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever…relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military cimmission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions…

    Quit refusing to believe your house is burning down all arround you.

  5. Brian Says:

    Man, that is unreal. Is there anything, Anyone can do about this?

  6. Feministe » Says:

    […] players been given an unfair trial, or had their Constitutional rights violated, or been, say, detained indefinitely, I’d be the first one raising hell — even if I thought they were guilty. But the Duke […]

  7. hipmonkey Says:

    I’m told this resolution did not pass and is not law. True?

    I think Bush should be held criminally liable for crimes against humanity, treason and war crimes. If Obama doesn’t make this happpen I have no faith in him as a vehicle for change – just more of the same.

  8. Matt Says:

    whats wrong with any of that? If you live in America and are not a terrorist, you don’t have anything to worry about. This bill will keep me and my family safe, because we can get legit info out of enemies through torture (as there is no other way). I think all evil dictators need to die, and the US is not a dictatorship. I fully support the torture of anybody who wishes to harm another INNOCENT human being. We do not torture the INNOCENT, we torture TERRORISTS. Rip their innards out with a fish hook and throw them to the dogs. DEATH TO ALL THEOCRACIES, DEATH TO SUNNI AND SHI’ITE RADICALS, DEATH TO NEO NAZIS, DEATH TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, ASSASSINATE PUL POT, AND GET THE REST OF THE POWS OUT OF SOUTHEAST ASIA GODDAMMIT. and Israel, keep on truckin those damn PLO members don’t deserve their lands for embracing the culture of the founder of the PLO, who is the inventor of modern terrorism.


  9. I got this web page from my pal who told me on the topic of this
    web site and at the moment this time I am browsing this website and reading
    very informative articles or reviews here.

  10. web page Says:

    Hello there, I found your site by way of Google even
    as looking for a comparable matter, your website got here
    up, it appears to be like good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply become aware of your blog thru Google, and found that it is really informative. I’m gonna be careful for brussels.
    I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future. A lot of people will probably be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

  11. health care Says:

    I’m really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog.
    Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?
    Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to
    see a great blog like this one these days.

  12. Cindi Says:

    I always used to study article in news papers but now as I am a
    user of internet thus from now I am using net for posts,
    thanks to web.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s